Balance

IMG_0207-Bob-Web-4x5

By Bob Lilienfeld, Sr. Director of Communications and Editor, The ULS (Use Less Stuff) Report.



 

Facebook
Google+
http://www.ameripen.org/blog/balance/
LinkedIn


ALL BLOGS

The New TSCA and Packaging


The Bathtub Shaped Curve


Packaging Sustainability Hangs in the Balance


How to Help CA Reduce Packaging Discards by 50%


Waste Reduction: Stepping Back
to See the Big Picture


Calling for Recycling Policies As An Effective Way to Boost Packaging Recycling


Packaging Optimization:
Taking a Systems Approach


Designing the Perfect Package:
It's  Not As Simple As It Seems


Non-Recycled Plastics to Energy:
The Power of Collaboration


Fighting the Myth of Packaging Waste


The Value of Neutrality

 

 

PACKAGING SUSTAINABILITY
HANGS IN THE BALANCE

Why did Whole Foods put a peeled orange in a package and charge $6 for it?

Was it because the company tries to:

A.  Maximize sales and profitability.

B.  Design packaging that meets protective, merchandising, and handling needs.

C.  Serve customers who want, and will pay for, the convenience of pre-peeled fruit.

D.  A & B

E.  All of the above.

The answer is obviously “C”. No, wait… it’s “A”. Hmmmm…. Maybe it’s “D”.

And, that’s the point. There is no one right answer. A package plays many roles, all of which are important to the sustainability of the product it contains, the consumer who buys the product, the store in which the product is purchased, and the supply chain that creates and distributes the product.

Of course, the devil is in the details: The goals of packaging vary greatly by need and expectations at different points in the supply chain. Sometimes these goals conflict and must be prioritized in order to create an acceptable balance of economic, environmental, and social gains and losses.

Given this, maybe the WF orange container really is an example of “egregious” packaging. But through which filter do we make such a pronouncement? We certainly know through which filter(s) consumers will make their decisions. Unfortunately, these may be not be the most efficient, effective, and expedient ways to conserve resources – even if they are among the easiest for consumers to adopt.

If we want to survive as an industry, we need to do a much better job of communicating all of the sustainability benefits (yes, and the costs) associated with packaging, and the filters used to determine the value and priority of these benefits.

No one is going to do this for us. Even the EPA, with its on-target and strategically important Sustainable Materials Management (SMM) program, is having a hard time explaining how their approach is more comprehensive than “the circular economy” approach, and why there is a lot more to enhancing sustainability than simply promoting more recycling.

Filling this void by clarifying the sustainable value of packaging is the key role played by AMERIPEN. We would very much welcome your thoughts, help, and support. Write me at blilienfeld@ameripen.org to discuss.


Note: The conclusions and views expressed in this article are those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect the views of AMERIPEN, its members, or affiliates.